Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Mendoza v. Broomfield
as 23-3766
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL MENDOZA
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
US v. Mendoza-Mendez
as 23-1926
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL MANUELLE MENDOZA-MENDEZ, a/k/a Mendo
Manuel Mendoza v. Fred Haas Motors, Limited
as 20-20123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MANUEL MENDOZA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
FRED HAAS MOTORS, LIMITED, a Texas Corporation
Mendoza v. Fred Haas Motors, Ltd.
as 4:2019cv04119
Defendant:
Fred Haas Motors, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Blair v. Westchester County
as 19-2120
Plaintiff:
Raychard Ruiz, Tony Blair and Courtney Pasley
Defendant / Appellee:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, Captain Roberts, Westchester County Jail, Eric Middleton, Assistant Warden Westchester County Jail and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dwayne White
Mendoza et al v. First Choice Payment Solutions G.P.
as 1:2019cv03349
Plaintiff:
Steve Quittschreiber, Abdul Jabbar Muhammad and Manuel Mendoza
Defendant:
First Choice Payment Solutions G.P., d/b/a Sekure Merchant Solutions, First Choice Payment Solutions G.P. and First Choice Payment Solutions G.P. doing business as Sekure Merchant Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendoza et al v. Storm Tight Windows of Texas, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Storm Tight Windows of Texas, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Mendoza and Emma Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv62592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pedro Celaya-Mongel v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72326
Petitioner:
PEDRO MANUEL CELAYA-MONGEL, AKA Sergio Manuel Mendoza
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
USA v. David Mendoza
as 18-10114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MANUEL MENDOZA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
