Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, The National Collegiate Master Student Loan Trust I, The National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2003-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. National Collegiate Master Student Loan Trust et al
as 1:2019mc00067
Defendant:
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2003-1, AG Super RMBS LLC, National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00748
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis v. American Coradius International, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv03143
Defendant:
American Coradius International, LLC and The National Collegiate Master Student Loan Trust I
Plaintiff:
Krystal Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BAUGHMAN v. ANDREWS & COX, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv00202
Defendant:
ANDREWS & COX, P.C., BOSTON PORTFOLIO ADVISORS, INC., EDUCATION RESOURCES INSTITUTE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L. BAUGHMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Goret v. Law Offices of Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C. et al
as 3:2014cv00809
Plaintiff:
Robin Goret
Defendant:
Law Offices of Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C. and National Collegiate Master Student Loan Trust-I
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv15053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv15054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
