Cases 1 - 10 of 944
Chinchilla-Navarro v. Garland
as 24-1571
Petitioner:
CESAR EZEQUIEL CHINCHILLA-NAVARRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Williams v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-3582
Plaintiff:
JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden, O. NAVARRO and others
Navarro Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3348
Petitioner:
ERIKA NAVARRO GONZALEZ and MANUEL ALEJANDRO NAVARRO GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Navarro Parra v. Villalonga Camargo
as 3:2024cv01290
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jose Navarro Parra
Defendant:
Maria Fernanda Villalonga Camargo
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 9001 International Child Abduction Remedies
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carolyn Navarro v. EXP Realty of California, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03880
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Navarro
Defendant:
EXP Realty of California, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Orozco-Navarro v. Garland
as 24-2161
Petitioner:
ROSALIO OROZCO-NAVARRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jonathan Colorado Navarro v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1253
Petitioner:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER COLORADO NAVARRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
United States v. Eleuterio Meza-Navarro
as 24-1524
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eleuterio Meza-Navarro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
