Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Michigan Depart of Envt, Great Lakes and Energy, et al v. Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority
as 24-1085
Plaintiff:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, GREAT LAKES AND ENERGY, on behalf of the People of the State of Michigan and DANA NESSEL, Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
GERALD R. FORD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY
Farr #607251 v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
Domonique Demetris Farr #607251
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan Law Revision Commission and People of the State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
People of the State of Michigan v. Lokinski
as 1:2023cv12326
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
Markel Ken Lokinski
Dana Nessel v. Enbridge Energy, LP, et al
as 23-1671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan
Defendant / Appellee:
ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LP, ENBRIDGE ENERGY COMPANY, INC. and ENBRIDGE ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
In re: Dana Nessel
as 23-102
Petitioner:
In re: DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan
Respondent:
ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LP, ENBRIDGE ENERGY COMPANY, INC. and ENBRIDGE ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
Dana NesselIn re: Dana Nessel
as 23-1148
Petitioner:
In re: DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Lay v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2022cv11095
Petitioner:
Reggie Lamour Lay
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan
State of California et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02583
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy
Intervenor Defendant:
Oshkosh Defense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
