Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Phillip Brown v. Mindy Braman
as 20-1918
Respondent / Appellee:
MINDY BRAMAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP BROWN and PHILLIP ANTHONY BROWN
USA v. Timothy Luke
as 17-40743
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY JEROME LUKE, also known as Walter Mitchell, also known as Skip, also known as Roy Evans, also known as Steve Edward Benson, also known as Phillip Brown, also known as Happy Luke, also known as Robert Bowers, also known as Sean Campbell, also known
Vega v. Invent Co: Administrator
as 17-6
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Vega
Defendant - Appellee:
Invent Co, Administrator, Invents Company, Adminsitrator, Invents CEO and others
USA v. Timothy Luke
as 15-41309
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY JEROME LUKE, also known as Steve Edward Benson, also known as Phillip Brown, also known as Roy Evans, also known as Happy Luke, also known as Walter Mitchell, also known as Robert Bowers, also known as Sean Campbell, also known as Skip, also known
Brown et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-18016
Plaintiff:
Penny Brown and Phillip Brown
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Joann Reynolds, et al v. Mallinckrodt Inc.
as 13-80085
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JOANN REYNOLDS, BILL LOWERY, KAREN JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
MALLINCKRODT INC.
Brown v. Harry
as 2:2009cv13899
Petitioner:
Phillip Brown
Respondent:
Shirlee A Harry
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
