Cases 1 - 10 of 34
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. KELLY et al
as 2:2022cv05067
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
LIAM KELLY, MAURICE COLLINS and SNUGBAR LLC doing business as CON MURPHY'S IRISH PUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Premium Sports, Inc. v. Mujcic et al
as 3:2016cv01683
Defendant:
442 LLC and Muhamed Mujcic
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984
Premium Sports, Inc. v. Lamas et al
as 1:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Maria Lamas and Good Friends, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. DOMINGUES et al
as 2:2014cv06887
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
ANTONIO JOAQUIM DOMINGUES and FERRY STREET BBQ INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Premium Sports, Inc. v. Eugenio Gibau , et al
as 1:2014cv00474
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Eugenio Gibau and Unik, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. Amaral et al
as 1:2014cv13971
Defendant:
Fernando Amaral, Marco P Amaral and Clipper Restaurant, Inc.
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Premier Sports Inc. v. Correia et al
as 1:2014cv13822
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
Antonio Correia, Luis Sousa, Mario Tavares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. Martins et al
as 1:2014cv13633
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
Alexander Martins, Tonias A Nogueira, Serafin Roniano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Premium Sports Inc. v. Stojak, III et al
as 3:2014cv01196
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
Walter J. Stojak, III and OCS Bar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. FILIPE
as 2:2014cv04594
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
PEDRO FILIPE and PJF ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
