Cases 1 - 10 of 18
USA v. Juan Corona-Gonzalez
as 24-1535
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JUAN A. CORONA-GONZALEZ, also known as JUAN R. RAMIREZ
GOODWYN et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
ZEKEQUELIN GOODWYN, LLOYD GOODWYN, ZEKEQUELIN R. GILBERT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Terence Sasaki v. Mark Inch, et al
as 19-16519
Defendant / Appellee:
DUTTON, C/O, FSL - Elkton, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY CLERK(S), NERO, SCHMIDT, CSO, FSL - Elkton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERENCE SASAKI
RIO GRANDE INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00720
Plaintiff:
LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT, RIO GRANDE INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER, ELSA HULL and others
Defendant:
STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, PATRICK M. SHANAHAN, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Mi Casita Social Club, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00098
Defendant:
Blanca E. Garcia, Sandra R. Ramirez, Mi Casita Social Club, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manuel Burruel v. Pam Ahlin et al
as 5:2017cv02248
Respondent:
Pam Ahlin, Marion Ashley, John J Benoit and others
Petitioner:
Manuel Burruel, III
Snapdragon, LLC v. Jesus Martinez Roman et al
as 2:2017cv06387
Defendant:
Isabelle Brilat, Does, Carol R. Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Snapdragon, LLC
DIRECTV, LLC v. Ramirez et al
as 4:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
Carlos R Ramirez, Celerina Ramirez and Casa Ramirez, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
In re: Jose Ramirez
as 13-15189
Petitioner:
In re: JOSE R. RAMIREZ
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Zarate vs Community Action Council of South Texas et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 7:11-CV-210
as 7:2013cv00095
Plaintiff:
Francisco G. Zarate
Defendant:
Community Action Council of South Texas , Bob Alderman , Tirso Amesquita and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
