Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cuper Development LLC et al v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Cuper Development LLC, Go Cudahy LLC, Davina LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Alfonso Noyola, Elizabeth Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jose Diaz Hernandez v. Attorney General United States
as 16-2682
Petitioner:
JOSE RAUL DIAZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Diaz-Rosado
as 16-1551
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE R. DIAZ-ROSADO, a/k/a Jose Diaz, a/k/a Jose R. Diaz, a/k/a Chiqui, a/k/a Alvaro Diaz, a/k/a Jose Raul Diaz, Raul Diaz Rosado, a/k/a Jose Rosado
USA v. Jose Diaz-Rosado
as 14-10746
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE R. DIAZ-ROSADO, a.k.a. Jose Raul Diaz, a.k.a. Raul Diaz Rosado, a.k.a. Jose Rosado
USA v. Raul Diaz-Moreno
as 12-40020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL DIAZ-MORENO
USA v. Victor Barahona-Diaz
as 10-41223
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VICTOR BARAHONA-DIAZ, also known as Francis Arnoldo Martinez-Portillo, also known as Nelson Montesino, also known as Israel Torres-Pagan, also known as Raul Diaz Arce, also known as Victor Diaz, also known as Israel Pagan Torres, also known as Diablo Chav
Raul Diaz-Aguilar v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-73338
Petitioner:
RAUL DIAZ-AGUILAR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
US v. Raul Martinez
as 08-4674
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL DIAZ MARTINEZ
US v. Raul Diaz-Ibarra
as 07-4420
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL DIAZ-IBARRA, a/k/a Raul Diaz Ibarra, a/k/a Raul Diaz, a/k/a Raul Ibarra-Diaz, a/k/a Raul Gonzales, a/k/a Ivarra Raul Diaz, a/k/a Rafael Diaz-Iberra, a/k/a Raul Moralez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
