Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Arthur Rouse, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 21-2696
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR J. ROUSE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON ALEXANDER SZYMANSKI, ALBERT REGINALD ROBERTSON, JOHN PATRICK MOORE, II and others
Defendant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, Michigan Governor
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, MELINDA K. BRAMAN, LEE MCROBERTS and others
Crotts v. Robinson
as 21-20347
Petitioner:
Alan Nelson Crotts
Respondent:
Reginald Robinson, Director of the Fort Bend Community Supervision and Corrections Department and Juli Mathew, Honorable Judge, Fort Bend County Court of Law
Layne Aucoin v. Andrew Cupil, et al
as 19-30779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAYNE AUCOIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW CUPIL, Lieutenant and REGINALD ROBINSON, Sergeant
Albert Robinson v. Adam Kandulski, et al
as 19-1330
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH ALTON, Nurse, MICHAEL P. MILLETTE, Physician Assistant, JOCQUE BENOIT, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT REGINALD ROBINSON
Albert Robinson v. Adam Kandulski, et al
as 19-1288
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH ALTON, Nurse, MICHAEL P. MILLETTE, Physician Assistant, JOCQUE BENOIT, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT REGINALD ROBINSON
Albert Robinson v. Adam Kandulski, et al
as 19-1221
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH ALTON, Nurse, MICHAEL P. MILLETTE, Physician Assistant, JOCQUE BENOIT, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT REGINALD ROBINSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robinson, et al v. Novak et al
as 1:2013cv06353
Defendant:
Edward J Novak , Roy M Payawal, Venkateswara R Kuchipudi and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Robinson and Lee A Hedricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
