Cases 1 - 10 of 13
US v. Robert Lockhart
as 24-4113
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT BRADLEY LOCKHART
US v. Robert Lockhart
as 22-4376
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT BRADLEY LOCKHART
Simmler v. Simmons, et al
as 21-4021
Defendant / Appellee:
S ROBERT BRADLEY, HARRIS H. SIMMONS, PALMER COURT APARTMENTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SIMMLER
Robert Scott v. Marcus McClung
as 20-6284
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, DELEGATE TERRY GENE KILGORE, SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BRADLEY SCOTT
Simmler v. Simmons, et al
as 20-4020
Defendant / Appellee:
S ROBERT BRADLEY, HARRIS H. SIMMONS, PALMER COURT APARTMENTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SIMMLER
Simmler v. Simmons, et al
as 19-4168
Defendant / Appellee:
S ROBERT BRADLEY, HARRIS H. SIMMONS, PALMER COURT APARTMENTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SIMMLER
Benjamin Wasson v. LogMeIn, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12330
Defendant:
William R. Wagner, Edward K. Herdiech, Logmein, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Larry Pollock, Robert Daub, Doug Van Riper and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Wasson
Spectrum Lighting Controls, Inc. v. Eison, et al
as 2:2018cv02243
Plaintiff:
Spectrum Lighting Controls, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Bradley Eison , Emory Eison , Zed Woodley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
IN RE NON-PARTY SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION et al v. MAZZOLA et al
as 1:2017mc01357
Movant:
LOUIS P. MALONE, III
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRADLEY NORRIS
Defendant:
LAWRENCE J. MAZZOLA, JR. , ROBERT E. BUCKLEY, JR. , ARMAND KILIJAN and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Norris v. Mazzola, Jr.
as 2:2017mc00013
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Norris
Defendant:
Lawrence J Mazzola, Jr.
Objector:
Plumbers and Pipe Fitters Union UA Local 17 Pension Plan and Frank Rodgers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
