Cases 1 - 10 of 68
NELSON WORLDWIDE, LLC v. PINBAR ARCHITECTURE, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03728
Plaintiff:
NELSON WORLDWIDE, LLC
Defendant:
PINBAR ARCHITECTURE, LLC, ROBERT WILSON AUSDENMOORE and ROBERT ANTHONY RINK
WILSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00988
Petitioner:
ROBERT WILSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robert DentIn re: Robert Dent
as 22-3434
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT WILSON DENT
Respondent:
TIMOTHY MORRIS, Police Officer, DARREN SMITH, YISLEIDY D. MINAYA-VARGAS, Reading Police Officer and others
United States of America v. Wilson
as 22-3010
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin Crosby, Sealed Defendant 2, Yefrel Brito, Sealed Defendant 3 and Marquis Yohanis
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Wilson, Sealed Defendant 1
James WilsonIn re: James Wilson
as 22-5997
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES ROBERT WILSON
Respondent:
JASON CLENDENION, Warden
Wilson v. PAG Austin L1 LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00939
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
PAG Austin L1 LLC and Santander Consumer USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Wilson (Yohanis)
as 22-388
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Wilson, Sealed Defendant 1, Kevin Crosby, Sealed Defendant 2 and Yefrel Brito, Sealed Defendant 3
Defendant / Appellant:
Marquis Yohanis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
