Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Hakimyar et al v. Habib Bank Limited
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Karim Hakimyar, Zara Karim, S.K. and others
Defendant:
Habib Bank Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Robert FiedlerIn re: Robert Fiedler
as 24-10273
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT EDWARD FIEDLER
Respondent:
MICHAEL RUDISILL, NANCY E. BRANDT, GINGER B. BOYD and others
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Nikki Mazzocchio, et al v. Cotter Corporation, et al
as 23-3709
Plaintiff:
Nikki Steiner Mazzocchio and Angela Steiner Kraus
Defendant:
Cotter Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company, DJR Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Futura Coatings, Inc. and others
Nikki Mazzocchio, et al v. Cotter Corporation, et al
as 23-8008
Respondent:
Nikki Steiner Mazzocchio and Angela Steiner Kraus
Petitioner:
Cotter Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company and St. Louis Airport Authority, A Department of the City of St. Louis
Not Classified By Court:
DJR Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Futura Coatings, Inc.
Steiner et al v. eBay Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11181
Plaintiff:
Ina Steiner, David Steiner and Steiner Associates, LLC
Defendant:
eBay Inc., Progressive F.O.R.C.E. Concepts, LLC, Devin Wenig and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thant et al. v. Veru, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv23960
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ewing, Kenneth Hepp and Dr. Myo Thant
Defendant:
Veru, Inc., Mitchell Steiner and Michele Greco
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al v. First Republic Bank et al
as 1:2011cv09572
Defendant:
Weintraub Capital Management, L.P., Florence S. Bradshaw, Board of Trustees of the Directors Guild of America-Producer Pension Plan, as administrator of the directors guild of America-Producer Pension Plan Basic Benefit Plan and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Enhanced RAFI (R) US Large, L.P.(sued herein as Research Affiliates Fundamental Index LP), Cutler Group, LP, Carol E Newman and others
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust Company, Board of Administration of the Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan, incorrectly named as "Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Employees Retirement Plan-LCV" and "Water, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and others
Interested Party:
Estate of Robert D. Nelson and Joint Board of Trustees of the Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust, as Administrator of the Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
