Cases 1 - 10 of 470
Agrawal v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission et al
as 5:2024cv00731
Defendant:
Brad Ice, John Does 1-5, Jeff Perkins and others
Plaintiff:
Kris K Agrawal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Nelums v. Hutchens Law Firm
as 24-1678
Defendant:
ALAN M. STEWART, an individual, HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, a S.C. professional association, JOHN S. KAY, an individual and others
Plaintiff:
DELMARSHI H. NELUMS and JOHN CALVIN NELUMS
Strickland v. Navient Solutions, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv61338
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Navient Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Christina L. Strickland
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
STRICKLAND v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00912
Petitioner:
KATIE STRICKLAND
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
STRICKLAND v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00794
Petitioner:
MICHAELA STRICKLAND
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Nelums et al v. Hutchens Law Firm, LLP et al
as 3:2024cv02427
Plaintiff:
John C. Nelums and Delmarshi Nelums
Defendant:
Hutchens Law Firm, LLP, PHH Mortgage Corporation, Cascade Funding Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Strickland et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Rusty Strickland, Alan and Amy West Farms, Alan West and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas James Vilsack, Zach Ducheneaux and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Strickland
as 2:2024mc04017
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bonnie Sue Strickland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
