Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Kia America, Inc. v. DMO Auto Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Kia America, Inc.
Defendant:
DMO Auto Acquisitions, LLC formerly doing business as Dan OBrien Kia of Concord, DMO North Hampton, LLC formerly doing business as Dan OBrien Kia of North Hampton, DMO Norwood LLC formerly doing business as Dan OBrien Kia Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hyundai Subaru of Nashville, Inc. v. Urban Science Applications, Inc.
as 2:2023mc51049
Plaintiff:
Hyundai Subaru of Nashville, Inc. also known as d/b/a Downtown Hyundai and Genesis of Downtown Nashville and d
Defendant:
Urban Science Applications, Inc.
Holzman v. Subaru of America Inc.
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Sydney Holzman
Defendant:
Subaru of America Inc and Subaru of America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Renee Giron v. Subaru of America, Inc.
as 22-3249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RENEE GIRON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-87
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giron v. Subaru of America, Inc
as 1:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Renee Giron
Defendant:
Subaru of America, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1605
Pegler v. Doug Smith Autoplex
as 21-4125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN G. PEGLER
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG SMITH AUTOPLEX, DBA Doug Smith Subaru
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
