Cases 1 - 10 of 75
US v. Malachi Sweeney-Teal
as 24-4285
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MALACHI JAMIR SWEENEY-TEAL
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Teal Petals Street Trust, et al.
as 24-1880
Not Yet Classified:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and TEAL PETALS STREET TRUST
Defendant:
CORPOLO AVENUE TRUST, RESOURCES GROUP, LLC, SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION and others
Burkhart v. University Interscholastic League (UIL) et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jerry burkhart
Defendant:
University Interscholastic League (UIL), Michael motheral, Arturo Rodriguez Cavazos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Constitutional Rights
Bram-Goldman v. Kleis-Pasarell
as 21-1960
Plaintiff:
TEAL PEAK CAPITAL, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN BRAM-GOLDMAN
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL GRZAN and NAMRATA KHIMANI
Interested Party:
GERALD KLEIS-PASARELL
Teal v. Lumpkin
as 21-20486
Petitioner / Appellant:
Leonard T. Teal
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Teal
as 21-50737
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Aimee Lee Teal, also known as Aimee Lyn Teal, also known as Aimee Lynn Teal
USA v. Teal
as 21-10446
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Rashad Teal
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. Teal
as 21-10375
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Rashad Teal
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
