Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Blackmon v. TitleMax of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Courtney Blackmon
Defendant:
TitleMax of Georgia, Inc. doing business as TitleMax and TMX Finance LLC
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 0987 Military Lending Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gomez v. NCP Finance Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2023cv01524
Plaintiff:
Katie J. Alvarez Gomez
Defendant:
NCP Finance Limited Partnership, TitleMax of Texas, Inc. and TitleMax of Texas Inc doing business as TitleMax
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Cobo v. TitleMax of Nevada, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01778
Plaintiff:
Alisia Cobo
Defendant:
TitleMax of Nevada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Yang v. TitleMax, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Paj Rose Yang
Defendant:
TitleMax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
C. Cottingham, et al v. TitleMax of Alabama, Inc.
as 22-90010
Petitioner:
C. DAVID COTTINGHAM, NAUQUITA L. HAMBRIGHT, JOHN GURTLER and others
Respondent:
TITLEMAX OF ALABAMA, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021at01116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BRETON v. TITLEMAX OF DELAWARE, INC. et al
as 5:2021cv05229
Lead Plaintiff:
GEOFFREY K. BRETON
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF DELAWARE, INC. and TRACY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
TitleMax of Texas v. City of Dallas
as 21-11170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TitleMax of Texas, Incorporated, Ivy Funding Company, L.L.C. and NPC Finance Limited Partnership
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Dallas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
