Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Smith v. Flores, et al.
as 24-1884
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
JACQUELINE FLORES and COUNTY OF NAPA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Duff et al v. City of Crossville, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher Duff, Starlene Gilbert, Boyd Alan Kearley and others
Defendant:
City of Crossville, Tennessee, Koby Wilson, Zach Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Smith
as 23-7029
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA THOMAS SMITH
Smith v. McDonough
as 23-1378
Claimant:
THOMAS SMITH, through the representative of his estate, Karen Hicks
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Rackauckas v. SafeMoon US et al
as 2:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rackauckas
Defendant:
SafeMoon US, SafeMoon Connect, Tano and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Kayla Blacksher v. SafeMoon LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Kayla Blacksher
Defendant:
SafeMoon LLC, SafeMoon US, LLC, SafeMoon Connect, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Safemoon Investor Group and Christopher Rackauckas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
US v. Lee Smith
as 21-7053
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LEE THOMAS SMITH
Michael Chieco, et al v. Kia Motors America, Inc., et al
as 21-55580
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVIS, CHARLES KORGER, Jr., DANIEL REILLEY and others
Appellant:
BLEICHMAN & KLEIN
Defendant / Appellee:
KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. and HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, FKA Hyundai Motor Company
US v. Joseph Smith
as 20-7848
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH THOMAS SMITH, a/k/a Joseph Smith
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
