Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
THRASHER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE THRASHER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Peaslee v. The Thrasher Group, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
Matthew Peaslee
Defendant:
The Thrasher Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniform Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA)
THRASHER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE THRASHER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Thrasher v. Small Business Administration
as 4:2022cv00931
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Thrasher
Defendant:
Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Thrasher v. Small Business Administration
as 2:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Thrasher
Defendant:
Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Brick v. Darnell et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Tisha Brick
Defendant:
Elaine Darnell, Kendra Otis, Lee Widner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Willie Smith v. Aaron Ford, et al
as 21-16907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE T. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
AARON FORD, JAMES DZURENDA, C. DANIELS and others
Joseph Littlefield v. Thomas Fithian, et al
as 21-35870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH TYLER LITTLEFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS FITHIAN, Deputy Director of Prisons, TIM THRASHER, Administrator, Department of Corrections, LORI LAWSON, Associate Superintendent, Clallam Bay Corrections Center and others
Doe v. Thrasher et al
as 3:2021cv02748
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Childs Cantey Thrasher, Donald Gist, Brian M. Barnwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
