Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Mawuili Adzasoo et al
as 2:2024cv05070
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Mervyn Cole, Jason Tyrone Jones, Mawuili Adzasoo and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Robert Koon v. Timothy Clark
as 21-7072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY CLARK, JORDAN WILLIAMS, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Defendant:
NURSE SARAH LENTZ, DOCTOR SEAN JONES, TRIDENT MEDICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Timothy Clark v. Josie Gastelo
as 21-55733
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSIE GASTELO, Warden
Deafueh Monbo v. Harford Memorial Hospital
as 21-1174
Plaintiff:
JUAHDI MONBO
Defendant / Appellee:
UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., REBECCA N. SMITH, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc., BRIAN GREGORY LAROCCO, individually and as an employee of Harford Memorial Hospital Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEAFUEH MONBO
Maxey v. Harris et al (JRG1)
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Samuel McCall, Jr., Santa Rosa Jr. College, Richard Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
James C Maxey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Auguste et al v. Synchrony Bank
as 3:2019cv00033
Petitioner:
Diana Burton, Richard Rose, Leah Azu and others
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Auguste et al v. Synchrony Bank
as 1:2019cv00087
Petitioner:
Diana Burton, Richard Rose, Leah Azu and others
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv60373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
