Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03636
Plaintiff:
Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03298
Plaintiff:
Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant:
Actavis Holdco US, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Valley Presbyterian Hospital et al v. Azar
as 3:2019cv01336
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II
Plaintiff:
Sanford USD Medical Center, Danbury Hospital, UF Health Jacksonville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BAPTIST ST. ANTHONY HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv01875
Plaintiff:
BAPTIST ST. ANTHONY HEALTH SYSTEM , MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CENTER , STORMONT-VAIL REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
The Shane Group, Inc. et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2010cv14360
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Other:
ADAC Automotive, Petoskey Plastics, Inc., Morbark, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Connolly, William Beaumont Hospital - Grosse Pointe, The Dow Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff:
The Shane Group, Inc., Bradley A. Veneberg, Scott Steele and others
Intervenor:
Priority Health Insurance Company, Spectrum Health Systems, CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Incorporated v. University of Michigan Health System
as 2:2007cv12441
Plaintiff:
Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Incorporated
Defendant:
University of Michigan Health System
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
