Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Star Colbert v. Dougan
as 24-1073
Plaintiff: STAR COLBERT, ASSENAGON CREDIT SUBDEBT AND COCO, AXIOM EUROPEAN FINANCIAL DEBT FUND LIMITED, Individually and on Behalf of Other Credit Suisse Group AG AT1 Bondholders and others
Defendant: BRADY W. DOUGAN, ERIC VARVEL, JAMES L. AMINE and others
Stein v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv02363
Plaintiff: Herbert Stein
Defendant: Thomas R. Cangemi, Alessandro P. Dinello, James J. Carpenter and others
5-Star General Store et al v. American Express Company et al
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff: 5-Star General Store, Bento LLC, Marc Allen, Inc. and others
Defendant: American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Manes v. United States of America, et al.
as 23-4138
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEAN MANES
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AWAD, Dr., ELIZABETH BAILEY and others
Lux v. Kelly
as 23-4019
Petitioner / Appellant: EVAN P. LUX
Respondent / Appellee: BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent of OSP
Tanya Cantu v. Lux Global Inc.
as 2:2023cv07192
Plaintiff: Tanya Cantu
Defendant: LUX GLOBAL INC. and Lux Global Inc. a California corporation doing business as Toplux Nutrition
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Star Colbert et al v. Dougan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07297
Plaintiff: Star Colbert, Assenagon Credit SubDebt and CoCo, Axiom Lux SICAV and others
Defendant: Brady W. Dougan, Eric Varvel, James L Amine and others
Interested Party: Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Star Colbert et al v. Dougan et al
as 1:2023cv04582
Plaintiff: Star Colbert, Assenagon Credit SubDebt and CoCo, Axiom Lux SICAV and others
Defendant: Brady W. Dougan, Eric Varvel, James L. Amine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Catalina Lux Satin v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1611
Petitioner: Catalina Lux Satin
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Lux Vending, LLC v. DDD, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00548
Petitioner: Lux Vending, LLC doing business as Bitcoin Depot
Respondent: DDD, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4 Petition to order arbitration; failure to arbitrate

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?