Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Janolkar et al v. HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA) et al
as 5:2012cv03692
Plaintiff:
Shirkant Janolkar and Vaishali Janolkar
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA), HSBC Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlton et al v. Mortgage Electronic Recordation systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Andrew B Carlton and Cheryle Carlton
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Recordation systems, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2004-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bashani v. HSBC Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2012cv00429
Plaintiff:
Gilad Bashani
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgatge, Inc. , HSBC Bank N.A. , Shapiro & Weisman, L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cazales et al V. HSBC Bank, NA
as 1:2012cv10263
Plaintiff:
Edith Cazales and Marie P Laguerre
Defendant:
HSBC Bank, N.A., Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cazales et al v. HSBC Bank, N.A., Trustee
as 1:2012cv10260
Plaintiff:
Edith Cazales and Marie P. Laguerre
Defendant:
HSBC Bank, N.A., Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
NOT USED
as 2:2011cv01869
Defendant:
DHI Mortgage Company, Ltd, HSBC Bank N.A., Mortgage Electronic Filing System and others
Plaintiff:
Sydney Sukuta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Sukuta v. DHI Mortgage Company, Ltd et al
as 3:2011cv00847
Defendant:
DHI Mortgage Company, Ltd, HSBC Bank N.A., Mortgage Electronic Filing System and others
Plaintiff:
Sydney Sukuta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Ray v. HSBC Bank, N.A.
as 1:2010cv00175
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray
Defendant:
HSBC Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Kollar v. HSBC Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2009cv00763
Plaintiff:
Tibor Peter Kollar
Defendant:
HSBC Bank N.A. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
