Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Shafer Plaza XIV, Ltd. v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Shafer Plaza XIV, Ltd.
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc. , Michael A. Swarzendruber and Melissa Davis
Counter_claimant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Shafer Plaza XIV, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madden et al v. Davis et al
as 4:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Madden and Shafer Plaza XIV, Ltd.
Defendant:
Melissa Davis, Michael Swartzendruber and Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNKNOWN HEIRS OF NOVITA C. CAMPBELL et al
as 3:2011cv00243
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
UNKNOWN HEIRS OF NOVITA C. CAMPBELL and ERIC SHAFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Foote et al
as 1:2011cv03254
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Andre Todd Foote, Ronald G. Tworek, Shirlee L. Tworek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SABR Mortgage Loan 2008-1 REO Subsidiary-1 LLC v. Shafer
as 1:2011cv01451
Plaintiff:
SABR Mortgage Loan 2008-1 REO Subsidiary-1 LLC
Defendant:
Clifford L Shafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Shafer v. IndyMac Bank FSB et al
as 8:2011cv00150
Defendant:
Aztec Foreclosure Corp, Deutsch Bank, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Shafer
Mark Shafer v. Indymac Bank FSB et al
as 8:2011cv00021
Defendant:
Aztec Foreclosure Corporation, Deutsche Bank, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Shafer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAFER
as 2:2010cv00833
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBIN M. SHAFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Shafer et al v. LG Electronics USA Inc
as 4:2009cv00105
Plaintiff:
Mac Shafer and Cecilio Castillo
Defendant:
LG Electronics USA Inc and LG Electronics USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shafer v. IRS
as 08-2198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
B. KAY SHAFER
Plaintiff:
LISA NOONAN
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
