Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Rover Pipeline, LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO(S) WV-HA--HL-001.000-ROW-T AND WV-HA-HL-002.000-ROW.
as 5:2017cv00015
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO(S) WV-HA--HL-001.000-ROW-T AND WV-HA-HL-002.000-ROW., S. W. Gardner, Kelly J. Otte and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountaineer Minerals, LLC v. Antero Resources Corporation
as 17-2058
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MOUNTAINEER MINERALS, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability company
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation formerly known as Antero Resources Appalachian Corporation
Solomon v. Fansler et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Triad Engineering, Inc., Advance Refrigeration, Inc, Clear Mountain Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mason v. Comcast of California/Maryland/Pennsylvania/Virginia/West Virginia, LLC
as 3:2019cv00031
Plaintiff:
Brenda Mason
Defendant:
Comcast of California/Maryland/Pennsylvania/Virginia/West Virginia, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. An easement to construct, operate and maintain a natural gas transmission line across 7.266 acres of land, more or less, in Putnam County, West Virginia et al
as 3:2018cv01532
Defendant:
88.04 acres of land, more or less, in Putnam County, West Virginia, owned by Scarlet Oaks Country Club (Tax Parcel ID No. 08-216-64.1), Unknown Persons and Interested Parties, An easement to construct, operate and maintain a natural gas transmission line across 7.266 acres of land, more or less, in Putnam County, West Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC, v. 2.42 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN UPSHUR COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA et al
as 2:2018cv00118
Defendant:
Barbara A. Shipley, 2.42 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN UPSHUR COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA and Randal G. Shipley
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Easements for the Storage of Natural Gas Underlying Properties in Preston County, West Virginia, 1.88 Acres Owned by Mt. Olivet Lutheran Church and the Mt. Olivet Cemetery (Parcel ID Nos. 05-14-002300 et al
as 1:2018cv00174
Defendant:
Easements for the Storage of Natural Gas Underlying Properties in Preston County, West Virginia, 1.88 Acres Owned by Mt. Olivet Lutheran Church and the Mt. Olivet Cemetery (Parcel ID Nos. 05-14-002300 and Unknown Persons and Interested Parties
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.16 Acre, more or less, in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, located on parcel identification No. 03-32-0034-0000-0000, and being more particularly described as Lot 18 in Parcel 2 in a deed in book 2 et al
as 2:2018cv00093
Defendant:
Lindsay Jaman South, Lindsay McVay Roberson, Erin Nichole Hankins Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways v. Jefferson County Commission et al
as 3:2018cv00122
Respondent:
Jefferson County Commission, Federal Emergency Management Agency and United States of America
Petitioner:
West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways
Cause Of Action: Actions affecting property on which United States had lien
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC, v. 0.12 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN UPSHUR COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 02-17-0062-0000-0000, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NO. 1 IN A GENERAL WARRANTY DEED et al
as 2:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Annette Seggelmann, Dieter Seggelmann and 0.12 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN UPSHUR COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 0000-0000, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NO. 1 IN A GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
