Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Kadiji Townsend
as 16-10736
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
KADIJI TANGANYIKA TOWNSEND
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Townsend
as 4:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Defendant:
Kadiji Tanganyika Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Gharzeddine v. Dunaway et al
as 3:2015cv00609
Plaintiff:
Farid Said Gharzeddine
Defendant:
Albert Bryan Dunaway, Carrington Mortgage Services, Selene Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Lacey et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00544
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Lacey and Melissa A. Lacey
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., EMC Mortgage, LLC , JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
James K. Hilburn v. Nitrell N. Townsend et al
as 2:2015cv05407
Defendant:
Does and Nitrell N. Townsend
Plaintiff:
James K. Hilburn
BENTON v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY et al
as 1:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
LARAY J. BENTON
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Townsend v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 3:2015cv02422
Plaintiff:
Alicia Townsend
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC , Quality Loan Service Corporation and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
McBride et al v. Weston Adams Law Firm et al
as 2:2015cv01704
Plaintiff:
Clayton McBride and Pauline Baker McBride
Defendant:
Weston Adams Law Firm, JP Morgan Chase, Jamie Dimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frank A James v. Maxime Cooks Townsend et al
as 2:2015cv02089
Defendant:
Does and Maxime Cooks Townsend
Plaintiff:
Frank A. James
ROGERS TOWNSEND & THOMAS, PC V. HARDEE, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00240
Defendant:
BEATRICE D. HARDEE and MELTON J. HARDEE
Plaintiff:
ROGERS TOWNSEND & THOMAS, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
