Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Taylor et al v. ARC Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02560
Plaintiff:
Ryan Taylor, Sheila Hall and Megan Young
Defendant:
ARC Automotive, Inc., FCA US LLC/RAM and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Affiliated FM Insurance Company v. Ram Construction Services of Michigan, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00233
Plaintiff:
Affiliated FM Insurance Company
Defendant:
Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers, Inc. doing business as Walker Consultants and RAM Construction Services of Michigan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAM Partners, LLC v. Johnson
as 1:2021cv01167
Defendant:
Kelly Johnson
Plaintiff:
RAM Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Hari Ram Nam, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01578
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust, National Association
Defendant:
Hari Ram Nam, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodcrest Village et al v. Moody
as 1:2020cv00064
Plaintiff:
Woodcrest Village and RAM Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Tereon Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Regency Park Apartments et al v. Humphries
as 1:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Erica Humphries
Plaintiff:
Regency Park Apartments and RAM Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Woodcrest Village et al v. Harvill
as 1:2019cv04948
Plaintiff:
Woodcrest Village and RAM Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Deangela Harvill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
1824 Defoor, RAM Partners, LLC v. Reece
as 1:2019cv02918
Defendant:
Joshua Reece
Plaintiff:
1824 Defoor, RAM Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ram Partners LLC v. Halimon et al
as 1:2019cv02001
Plaintiff:
Ram Partners LLC and The Pointe at Vinings
Defendant:
Lashawn Halimon and Rodney Halimon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
(PS) Vohra v. Mobley et al
as 2:2018cv02696
Defendant:
Tiros Mobley and Diema Mobley
Petitioner:
Ram Parkash Vohra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
