Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kane County, et al v. United States, et al
as 22-4087
Plaintiff / Appellee: KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision
Not Yet Classified: STATE OF UTAH
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, SIERRA CLUB, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. .12 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Washington County, Maryland, State of Maryland, Department of Natural Resources We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01444
Plaintiff: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant: .12 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Washington County, Maryland, State of Maryland, Department of Natural Resources
Amicus Curiae: Sierra Club, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Waterkeepers Chesapeake and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Tooele County, et al v. United States, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-4062
Plaintiff - Appellee: TOOELE COUNTY and STATE OF UTAH
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Movant - Appellant: SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE
Movant: THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB
North Dakota, et al v. Badlands Conservation Alliance, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1785
Plaintiff - Appellee: North Dakota, ex rel., Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General for the State of North Dakota, Billings County, North Dakota, Golden Valley County, North Dakota and others
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America and United States of America
Movant - Appellant: Badlands Conservation Alliance, Sierra Club, National Parks Conservation Association and others
Kane County, Utah, et al v. United State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-4108
Plaintiff - Appellant: KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision
Plaintiff-Intervenor: THE STATE OF UTAH
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: THE SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB
Kane County, Utah, et al v. United State
as 13-4110
Plaintiff - Appellee: KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee: THE STATE OF UTAH
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: THE SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB
Kane County, Utah, et al v. United State
as 13-4109
Plaintiff: KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellant: THE STATE OF UTAH
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: THE SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB
Minard Run Oil Company v. US Forest Ser We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4160
Plaintiff - Appellee: MINARD RUN OIL COMPANY, PENNSYLVANIA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION, ALLEGHENY FOREST ALLIANCE and others
Defendant - Appellee: US FOREST SER, ABIGAIL R. KIMBELL, KENT P. CONNAUGHTON and others
Defendant - Appellant: ALLEGHENY DEFENSE PROJECT and SIERRA CLUB
West v. Northern Spotted Owl Policy Work Group et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05381
Plaintiff: Arthur West
Defendant: Northern Spotted Owl Policy Work Group, Lois Schwennesen, Schwennesen Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Minard Run Oil Company, et al v. US Forest Ser, et al
as 10-2332
Plaintiff - Appellee: MINARD RUN OIL COMPANY, PA OIL AND GAS ASSN, ALLEGHENY FOREST ALLIANCE and others
Defendant - Appellant: US FOREST SER, ABIGAIL R. KIMBELL, in her official capacity as Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, KENT P. CONNAUGHTON, in his official capacity as regional Forester for the US. Forest Service, Eastern Region and others
Defendant - Appellee: FOREST SER EMPLOYEES FOR ENV ETHICS, ALLEGHENY DEFENSE PROJECT and SIERRA CLUB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?