Cases 91 - 100 of 29,012
Payton v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Marvin Christopher Payton
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Eagal v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Eagal
Defendant:
United States of America
Campbell v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
Candice Lindsay Campbell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
J.J. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 3:2024cv03035
Plaintiff:
J J
Defendant:
United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons and Fraser Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ji et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03631
Plaintiff:
Quanyue Ji
Defendant:
United States of America, Christina Martinez and Charles Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Luning v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Michele A. Luning
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
HOUCK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
MARK HOUCK and RYAN-MARIE HOUCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL ROGERS, JUAN BARRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Vargas v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01901
Plaintiff:
Rosa Vargas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hogberg et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Travis Hogberg and Audrey Rodriguez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kendrick v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01292
Plaintiff:
Stevan Kendrick
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0742 Suits in Admiralty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
