Cases 121 - 130 of 837
DUNHAM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25350
Plaintiff:
JOSH DUNHAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALLEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25260
Plaintiff:
JOSH ALLEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08645
Plaintiff:
Josh Marshall
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Muenzer v. JUUL Labs, Inc. previously d/b/a as PAX LABS, INC. and PLOOM INC et al
as 3:2022cv07913
Plaintiff:
Josh Muenzer
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JACKSON v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2022cv07072
Plaintiff:
JOSH JACKSON
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROUNS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24004
Plaintiff:
JOSH ROUNS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Heathcock v. Speed Intermodal et al
as 2:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Debbie Heathcock
Defendant:
Speed Intermodal, Srikanth Vangala, Freedom 1 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Queen v. Waffle House Inc et al
as 6:2022cv04193
Plaintiff:
Joseph Queen
Defendant:
Waffle House Inc and Josh Cartwright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FRASIER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23119
Plaintiff:
JOSH FRASIER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILBURN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23020
Plaintiff:
JOSH WILBURN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
