Cases 11 - 20 of 312
Mithun Banerjee v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 22-2181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITHUN BANERJEE
Plaintiff:
BANERJEE HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., THE CORPORATION TRUST, INCORPORATED, TESSA LASPIA FREDERICK and others
Mithun Banerjee v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 22-2182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITHUN BANERJEE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., VIVIANA QUISHPE-NARVAEZ, THE CORPORATION TRUST, INCORPORATED and others
Galt Landscape LLC v. Bank of America N.A.
as 5:2022cv00990
Plaintiff:
Galt Landscape LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Nicholson v. Bank of America
as 22-11064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Harriet Nicholson
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America and Countrywide Home Loans, Incorporated
Jackson v. Bank of America
as 5:2022cv05217
Plaintiff:
Stacy O. Jackson
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cao v. Bank Of America, N.A. et al
as 0:2022cv61930
Plaintiff:
Liying Cao
Defendant:
Bank Of America, N.A. and Irving Waltmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Hall v. Bank of America N.A.
as 1:2022cv03288
Plaintiff:
Catherine Hall
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jackson v. Bank of America
as 5:2022cv05105
Plaintiff:
Stacy O. Jackson
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
John Young v. Bank of America, NA
as 22-55428
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN C. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA
Doris Walker v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 22-1680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DORIS V. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and LIENHUB, Third Party, doing business as GRANT STREET GROUP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
