Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Ray, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
WHITMER v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD WHITMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Rayford, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
CUNDIFF et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv01860
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CUNDIFF, DAVID EDWARDS CUNDIFF, CHRISTA RENEE CUNDIFF and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24978
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD EVANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14838
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAMIQUIZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14028
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD LAMIQUIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLAIBORN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11216
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD CLAIBORN and DAVID E CLAIBORN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09211
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD BROCK and DAVID EDWARD BROCK, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
