Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Shallcross et al v. M&T Bank Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01082
Plaintiff:
Brent Shallcross and Jane Shallcross
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation , Equifax Information Services, LLC , Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America ex rel. Keisha Kelschenbach v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2013cv00280
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Keisha Kelschenbach
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Movant:
Sealed Movant 1 , Sealed Movant 2 and Sealed Movant 3
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Muradas et al v. M&T Bank et al
as 0:2013cv60178
Plaintiff:
Yaquelin Muradas and Jose A. Hernandez
Defendant:
M&T Bank and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Banks v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Yolanda T. Banks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Banks v. Ecolab, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
Yolanda T. Banks
Defendant:
Ecolab, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoffman v. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company et al
as 1:2011cv01377
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hoffman
Defendant:
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company , M&T Bank, Himmelrich Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Canty et al v. BB&T Bank (Branch Banking & Trust) et al
as 2:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ceshia Canty and Lillian Richardson
Defendant:
BB&T Bank (Branch Banking & Trust), BB&T Bank (Branch Banking & Trust), Janie Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BANKS v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv63696
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T. BANKS and WILLIAM T. BANKS
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Abitbol et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01868
Plaintiff:
Haim V. Abitbol, Richard A. Ables, Sr., Santos Abreu Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
