Cases 11 - 18 of 18
JOY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01263
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY JOY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Calderon v. Pepsi Bottling Group Inc
as 3:2009cv00333
Plaintiff:
Raul S. Calderon
Defendant:
Pepsi Bottling Group Inc and Pepsi Bottling Group Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Elmore v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00140
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Elmore and Gwendolyn Elmore
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Pepsi Bottling Group Inc, The
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SALOMON v. THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP et al
as 2:2008cv01565
Plaintiff:
DOLORES ANGELIKA SALOMON
Defendant:
THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, BOTTLING GROUP, LLC, THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Criswell et al v. Pepsi Bottling Group, et al.
as 5:2008cv00257
Plaintiff:
Joyce Criswell and Earl Criswell
Defendant:
Pepsi Bottling Group, Pepsi Bottling Group, Pepsi Bottling Group and others
Movant:
Acosta Sales, LLC and Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Criswell et al v. Piggly Wiggly Store #398 et al
as 6:2008cv00619
Plaintiff:
Joyce Criswell and Earl Criswell
Defendant:
Piggly Wiggly Store #398 and Pepsi Bottling Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Martin v. New Bern Transport Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02844
Plaintiff:
Debra Martin
Defendant:
New Bern Transport Corporation and Pepsi Bottling Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Housam v. Albertson's Inc et al
as 4:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Housam and Mohamed Housam
Defendant:
Albertson's Inc, Albertson's Inc and Pepsi Bottling Group, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
