Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Viktoriya Sunde, et al v. Michael Haley, et al
as 13-15628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIKTORIYA SOKOL SUNDE and J. MICHAEL SUNDE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HALEY, Washoe County Sheriff, CHARLES LIGHTNER, Washoe County Sheriff Deputy, SHIGETA, Washoe County Sheriff Deputy and others
Sunde v. Haley, et al
as 3:2012cv00416
Defendant:
Michael Haley, Charles Lightner, Shigeta and others
Plaintiff:
J. Michael Sunde and Viktoriya Sokol Sunde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROWE v. ZEKA
as 1:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ROWE
Defendant:
SOKOL ZEKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOKOL v. USA
as 1:2011cv00772
Plaintiff:
DANIEL S. SOKOL
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
GRJG, Inc., et al v. Sokol
as 1:2011cv23593
Plaintiff:
GRJG, Inc. and Guillermo J. Ramis
Defendant:
Alan Sokol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martone v. Sokol et al
as 1:2011cv00377
Defendant:
Robert A. Fontana and Jana M. Sokol
Plaintiff:
Dominic R. Martone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Sokol v. Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Teresa Sokol
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated, Zicam LLC, Zicam Swab Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sokol v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv01185
Plaintiff:
Teresa Sokol
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., Zicam LLC, Zicam Swab Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRJG, Inc. D/B/A Paradigm Associates et al v. Sokol
as 3:2010cv01542
Plaintiff:
GRJG, Inc. D/B/A Paradigm Associates and Guillermo J. Ramis
Defendant:
Alan Sokol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOKOL et al v. HEADMEN MINES, ITD. et al
as 2:2010cv64532
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. SOKOL and EDNA G. SOKOL
Defendant:
HEADMEN MINES, ITD. , ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD. , VERMONT ASBESTOS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
