Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Spadafore et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00928
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Spadafore and Ray Spadafore
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leighton v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv20162
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Leighton
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. and Asian Overland Services Tours & Travel Sdn Bhd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPADAFORE et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07212
Plaintiff:
DONNA LEE SPADAFORE and RAY SPADAFORE
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS
as 3:2014cv05410
Plaintiff:
ALFRED BROWN , OTIS CLARK , WILLIAM COOLEY and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01256
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee et al v. Emeritus Corporation
as 1:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
Delton E Lee , Clayton R Lee and Donna Lee Cato
Defendant:
Emeritus Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv24246
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vuono v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv21289
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Vuono
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smathers et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18922
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Smathers and Victor Dean Smathers
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lemelin v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv13592
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Lemelin
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
