Cases 21 - 29 of 29
PETER v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72189
Plaintiff:
HAROLD J. PETER
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brenda Kava, et al v. Michael Peters, II, et al
as 09-2327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA KAVA and BRADLEY KAVA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. PETERS, II
Defendant:
JAMES P. VAN WAGNER and MVP ORTHOPEDICS & SPORTS MEDICINE
Domina v. Peters
as 2:2009cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jake T Domina
Defendant:
Mitchell J Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Loyd v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv09016
Plaintiff:
Earl T. Loyd
Defendant:
The United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Medical Center East Orange and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kava et al v. Van Wagner et al
as 1:2007cv00507
Plaintiff:
Brenda Kava and Bradley Kava
Defendant:
James P. Van Wagner, MVP Orthopedics & Sports Medicine and Michael J. Peters, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PETERS v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63815
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND J. PETERS
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Maldonado-Romano v. MMCA Lease Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv00362
Plaintiff:
Lucia Maldonado-Romano
Defendant:
Jennifer B. Newman and Jennifer B. Newman
Arbitrator:
J. Peter Coll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Peters v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv09139
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., The Budd Company, Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Congress, et al
as 2:2003cv00804
Plaintiff:
Parviz Karim-Panahi
Defendant:
Congress, Judiciary/Judges/Attorneys, Government of USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
