Cases 31 - 40 of 999
Leyde v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Taylor Leyde
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Mofford v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2023cv05723
Plaintiff:
William J Mofford
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Bugos v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2023cv05271
Plaintiff:
Glen T Bugos
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Duncan v. BNSF Railway Company
as 6:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Craig Duncan
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
LHeureux v. BNSF Railway Company
as 8:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michael LHeureux and Michael L'Heureux
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc.
as 23-35507
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Relator and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CENTER FOR ASBESTOS RELATED DISEASE, INC.
Tierney, Timothy v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Tierney
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howard v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2023cv03096
Plaintiff:
Colton Howard
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jaeger v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Jaeger
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Lynn v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Jason Lynn
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
