Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Hylton v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 7:2016cv00256
Plaintiff:
Lela Hylton
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hylton v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 1:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Lela Hylton
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HYLTON v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01078
Plaintiff:
JOHN HYLTON
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hylton v. General Motors LLC et al
as 7:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Carlena Hylton
Defendant:
General Motors LLC , Takata Seat Belts, Inc., , Childers & Venters Motors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hylton v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51705
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Hylton
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hylton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09098
Plaintiff:
Mary Hylton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hylton v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv05639
Plaintiff:
Dianne Hylton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HYLTON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01821
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HYLTON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Akines et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00612
Plaintiff:
Brenda Akines, Regina Banks, Lesslie Bishop and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
