Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv01033
Plaintiff:
William M. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
LLOYD v. STEPHENSON et al
as 2:2016cv06065
Plaintiff:
HAROLD LLOYD
Defendant:
MARVIN STEPHENSON, DEBORAH M. BAKER, GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Baker v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09775
Plaintiff:
Dorothy M. Baker
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Green Tree Servicing LLC
as 4:2015cv04567
Plaintiff:
Tammy M Baker
Defendant:
Green Tree Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12917
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. Baker and Andrew Baker
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07441
Plaintiff:
Beulah M. Baker
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Etihcon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01650
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Baker
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01301
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Baker and Marjorie R. Baker
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy International Limited , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Baker
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv28679
Plaintiff:
Rose M. Baker and David A. Baker, Sr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
