Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Mazza v. Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02964
Defendant:
Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services, LLC, Summerlin Las Vegas Baseball Club, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mazza and Sophia A. Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell v. Aramark Services, Inc. (erroneously sued as "Lifeworks Restaurant")
as 5:2016cv07065
Plaintiff:
Douglas Campbell
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. (erroneously sued as "Lifeworks Restaurant")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garza v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00240
Plaintiff:
Miguel Garza
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frankel v. Aramark Business Facilities LLC et al
as 2:2016cv03101
Plaintiff:
Ivy Frankel
Defendant:
Aramark Services Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schulte v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2016cv04429
Plaintiff:
Mary Schulte
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00397
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Wilson
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Littlejohn v. Kimco Facility Services, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00772
Plaintiff:
Arnita Littlejohn
Defendant:
Kimco Facility Services, LLC, Prefco XIV, Aramark Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alexander v. ARAMARK Services, Inc et al
as 4:2016cv00892
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander
Defendant:
ARAMARK Services, Inc and Nabors Offshore Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fry v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2015cv03325
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Fry
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP , Aramark Services, Inc. , John Doe Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Washington v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02522
Plaintiff:
Dionne Washington
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
