Cases 41 - 50 of 366
Quinn Bass v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 23-55304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINN BASS, W.O.P.
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM, CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL ROB BONTA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JASON ANDERSON and others
Elliott v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv19464
Plaintiff:
Gavin Elliott
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abend v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Gavin Abend
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gavin v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Tonya Cooper Gavin
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
SPICER v. GAVIN
as 2:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN SPICER, III
Defendant:
CHARLES ANDREW GAVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gavin v. Cable Dahmer Chevrolet, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Milleshia Candace Gavin
Defendant:
Cable Dahmer Chevrolet, Inc. and Ally Financial
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Hunter v. Laycock et al
as 2:2023cv02064
Plaintiff:
Joe Larry Hunter
Defendant:
Stephen Laycock, John Brown, Terry Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
GAVIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA GAVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANDRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01971
Plaintiff:
GAVIN LANDRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pathan v. Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Atik Pathan
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom and Jennifer Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
