Cases 41 - 49 of 49
DeVine v. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01264
Defendant:
XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sandra DeVine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Spann v. Larose et al
as 1:2017cv02586
Plaintiff:
Leonard C. Spann
Defendant:
Alan W. Larose and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker et al v. Wallace et al
as 1:2017cv05077
Plaintiff:
George Baker, III and George Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Edward L. Wallace and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roman v. Viscarra et al
as 1:2017cv04283
Plaintiff:
Edwin A. Roman
Defendant:
Jose L. Viscarra and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC v. HOWARD TRANSPORTATION, INC et al
as 2:2017cv00447
Plaintiff:
XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC
Defendant:
HOWARD TRANSPORTATION, INC , HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. and EDWARD P. TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chandler v. Jordan et al
as 1:2016cv00358
Plaintiff:
Bryan Earl Chandler
Defendant:
Morris Lloyd Jordan , Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP , Penske Truck Leasing Co., Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Con-Way Freight, Inc. , Derek Matthew Sise and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ceva Logistics US, Inc. , Morris Lloyd Jordan , Penske Truck Leasing Co., Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donovan v. ConWay Freight Inc.
as 4:2016cv01910
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Donovan
Defendant:
XPO Logistics Freight, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vanhorn v. Robinson III et al
as 1:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
Richard Vanhorn
Defendant:
Charles Robinson III , Con-way Freight, Inc. and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Haupert v. Brown et al
as 3:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
Tiffany J Haupert
Defendant:
Michael K Brown and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
