Cases 61 - 67 of 67
MAUNEY et al v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv83255
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY WILLIAM MAUNEY and CAROLYN ARMSTRONG MAUNEY
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ATLAS FOUNDRY COMPANY INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manning et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor By Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00146
Plaintiff:
John Harrell Manning and Nannie Mae Manning
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor By Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., BW/IP Inc., a subsidiary of Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mauney et al v. A. O. Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00232
Plaintiff:
Sidney William Mauney and Carolyn Armstrong Mauney
Defendant:
A. O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor By Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Atlas Foundry Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gold et al v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00276
Plaintiff:
Carl Gold and Denise Gold
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stayton v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2009cv01514
Plaintiff:
Virgie Stayton and Virgie Stayton
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, American Standard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kortekamp v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2008cv00043
Plaintiff:
Todd Kortekamp
Defendant:
3M Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MILICH v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv00145
Plaintiff:
WALTER MILICH and WALTER MILICH
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ARGO PACKING COMPANY, CASHCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
