Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Davis v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2015cv01272
Plaintiff:
John Davis
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Lilly USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv04624
Plaintiff:
John Davis and Debra Davis
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rawdon et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27240
Plaintiff:
Deborah Rawdon and John Davies
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
as 6:2014cv02540
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Adams , Haley B Alfred , Taylor A Alfred and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis, Jr v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv02608
Plaintiff:
John Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv17987
Plaintiff:
Earnestine Davis and John Davis
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2014cv03344
Plaintiff:
EARNESTINE DAVIS and JOHN DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC. and ETHICON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00161
Plaintiff:
Keith John Davis
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02917
Plaintiff:
Deborah A. Davis and John Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51850
Plaintiff:
John Davis
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
