Cases 61 - 70 of 296
Ketterer v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
as 2:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
Philip Ketterer
Defendant:
Emerson Electric Co. , Emerson Tool Company , Sears Roebuck and Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winkel et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al
as 2:2015cv02129
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Company, Does 1-450, W.W. Henry Company and others
Plaintiff:
Winkel, Judith Winkel and John Winkel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirksey v. Schindler Elevator Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Tyra Kirksey
Defendant:
Schindler Elevator Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ketterer v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 3:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Philip Ketterer
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Sears Holding Corporation , Emerson Electric Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Weiland v. Crane Co.
as 1:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Weiland, Jerome E. Weiland and Carole L. Weiland
Defendant:
Crane Co., Zurn Industries, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirksey v. Schindler Elevator Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Tyra Kirksey
Defendant:
Schindler Elevator Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kimco Staffing Services, Inc. v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09880
Defendant:
Does, Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kimco Staffing Services, Inc.
BURNS-WILLIAMS v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 4:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
ALISON BURNS-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
BURNS-WILLIAMS v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO
as 4:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
ALISON BURNS-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO and CRAIG LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Warren v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 3:2014cv00759
Plaintiff:
Shonda Warren
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Tanza Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
