Cases 61 - 70 of 178
Smith v Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 3:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
Tyler Smith
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph Suddreth et al v. BRE Properties Inc et al
as 8:2016cv00212
Defendant:
BRE Properties Inc, Does, Essex Property Trust Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Luz Rocha, Luz Rocha, Joseph Suddreth and others
Cooper, DDS v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 6:2015cv02249
Plaintiff:
Dr. Sean A. Cooper, DDS
Defendant:
Maytag Sales, Inc. and Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jeong v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv03177
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation , Corning Incorporated and World Kitchen LLC
Plaintiff:
Sun Hee Jeong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunt v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Gracie Hunt
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC and Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deeds v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
Judith Deeds and David Deeds
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kljajich et al v Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2015cv05980
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff:
Beth Kljajich , Kathleen Cates and Francisco Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Burdt v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 4:2015cv01563
Plaintiff:
William Burdt
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
E. P., et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 5:2015cv00538
Defendant:
Does and Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff:
E. P. and Consuelo Padilla
McMahan et al v. Rheem Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Justin McMahan and Danielle Bissell
Defendant:
Rheem Manufacturing Company, Emerson Electric Co., Trinity Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
