Cases 1 - 10 of 15
EVERETT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22426
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EVERETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Everett v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03892
Plaintiff:
Charles Everett
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GLEASON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06434
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CHARLES EVERETT GLEASON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gleason v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
Justin Charles Everett Gleason
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
EVERETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13558
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv53395
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EVERETT LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PULLIAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31410
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EVERETT PULLIAM
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02897
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EVERETT BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15246
Plaintiff:
Candice Tullier Cook and Charles Everett Cook
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mays v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02279
Plaintiff:
Charles Everett Mays
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
