Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BAKER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv06118
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA BAKER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv16375
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Baker
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker et al v. Aramark Refreshment Services, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01110
Defendant:
Erie Insurance, DeShaun E. Horton and Aramark Refreshment Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baker and Cynthia Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv13170
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Baker and Fred Baker
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruiz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv00583
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ruiz , Deborah Fairbanks , Lovina Serbus and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pamela Ruiz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv06289
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Baker, Freda Barnes, Joni Berkebile and others
Defendant:
Does, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon LLC and others
Emana et al vs McKesson
as 3:2013cv03157
Plaintiff:
Connie Emana , Ellendar Adams-Mackerl , Annette Agard and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker et al v. Peachtree Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00257
Plaintiff:
Willie Baker and Cynthia Baker
Defendant:
Peachtree Construction, Inc. and Daniel Webster Young, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
