Cases 1 - 10 of 18
MARSHALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03416
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK D MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARSHALL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03116
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA D. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall et al v. Hospira Worldwide, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv08710
Plaintiff:
Darlene H. Marshall and Jerome D. Marshall
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc. and Hospira Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01699
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , C. EPHRUSSI , AMY MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07247
Plaintiff:
Jennifer D. Marshall and David C. Marshall
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00857
Plaintiff:
Jennifer D Marshall and David C Marshall
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jennifer Marshall v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 16-1631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER D. MARSHALL and DAVID C. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHICON, INCORPORATED and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
MITCHELL v. EPHRUSSI, et al
as 1:2015cv01975
Plaintiff:
WALLACE G. MITCHELL
Defendant:
C. EPHRUSSI , AMY MORGAN , ANN SAVARESE and others
Jones et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
as 6:2014cv02541
Plaintiff:
Constance Jones , Jones Ernest, Sr , E'mon Jones and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03669
Plaintiff:
Melia A. Marshall and Guy D. Marshall
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
