Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Trenton Johnson v. Exide Technologies, Inc.
as 23-3528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Trenton D. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Exide Technologies, Inc.
Johnson v. Exide Technologies, Inc.
as 5:2020cv06036
Plaintiff:
Trenton D Johnson
Defendant:
Exide Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 5:2018cv03445
Defendant:
EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILLEN v. THE BOEING COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv03118
Plaintiff:
MARILYN GILLEN
Defendant:
THE BOEING COMPANY , FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, BRAND INSULATIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Sproles v. Exide Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00356
Defendant:
Exide Technologies, Inc. and Tyronne Perry
Plaintiff:
Larry Sproles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hoffman et al v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 2:2010cv14179
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hoffman and Laura Hoffman
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC, Exide Technologies, Inc. and Georgia-Pacific Corrugated, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ezell v. Exide Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00125
Plaintiff:
Mary Ezell, Mary Ezell and Mary Ezell
Defendant:
Exide Technologies, Inc. and Genuine Parts Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dickson et al v. Exide Technologies Inc et al
as 4:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
David Ray Dickson, David Ray Dickson, Betty J. Dickson and others
Defendant:
Exide Technologies Inc and Ronald Dillard Sarrett
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Marrs v. Exide Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Charles Marrs
Defendant:
Exide Technologies Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dickson et al v. Exide Technologies Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00434
Plaintiff:
David Ray Dickson and Betty J. Dickson
Defendant:
Exide Technologies Inc and Ronald Dillard Sarrett
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
